Tim Brunson DCH

Welcome to The International Hypnosis Research Institute Web site. Our intention is to support and promote the further worldwide integration of comprehensive evidence-based research and clinical hypnotherapy with mainstream mental health, medicine, and coaching. We do so by disseminating, supporting, and conducting research, providing professional level education, advocating increased level of practitioner competency, and supporting the viability and success of clinical practitioners. Although currently over 80% of our membership is comprised of mental health practitioners, we fully recognize the role, support, involvement, and needs of those in the medical and coaching fields. This site is not intended as a source of medical or psychological advice. Tim Brunson, PhD

EEG asymmetry and heart rate during experience of hypnotic analgesia in high and low hypnotizables.



This study evaluates the effects of hypnotic analgesia and hypnosis on bilateral EEG activity recorded from frontal, central and posterior areas during three painful electrical stimulation conditions: waking, hypnosis/no-analgesia, hypnosis/analgesia. Eight high-hypnotizable and eight low-hypnotizable (right handed) subjects participated in the experiment. The following measures were obtained: pain and distress tolerance ratings; EEG spectral amplitudes for the frequency bands: delta (0.5-3.75 Hz), theta 1 (4-5.75 Hz), theta 2 (6-7.75 Hz), alpha 1 (8-9.75 Hz), alpha 2 (10-12.75 Hz), beta 1 (13-15.75 Hz), beta 2 (16-31.75 Hz), total band (0.5-31.75 Hz), '40-Hz' (36-44 Hz); cardiac interbeat interval (ms); mid-frequency and high-frequency peaks from power spectral analysis of heart period variability. During hypnosis/analgesia, high hypnotizable subjects displayed significant reductions in pain and distress scores compared to hypnosis/no-analgesia and waking conditions. In each experimental condition these subjects displayed significant lower total and beta 1 amplitudes compared to low hypnotizables. High hypnotizables, on central and posterior recording sites, during both hypnosis/analgesia and hypnosis/no-analgesia conditions also showed total and delta EEG amplitude reductions in both hemispheres and a theta 1 amplitude reduction in the left hemisphere. However, for total, delta and beta 1 bands in the hypnosis/analgesia condition the amplitude reduction was more pronounced in the right hemisphere as shown by hemispheric asymmetry in favor of the left hemisphere. Low hypnotizables, on posterior recording sites, displayed a delta amplitude reduction during hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. These subjects also showed, for all recording sites, a reduction in theta 1 amplitude during hypnosis/no-analgesia compared to the waking condition. Lows, however, failed in evidencing amplitude differences between hypnosis/no-analgesia and hypnosis/analgesia conditions. During hypnotic analgesia the hemispheric asymmetry found in high hypnotizables was parallel to a significant reduction in the spectral mid-frequency peak of heart period variability which indicated a decrease in the level of sympathetic activity. In contrast, during hypnosis/no-analgesia the EEG amplitude reduction was not paralleled by a decrease in sympathetic activity.

Department of Psychology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy.

Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Feb-Mar;21(2-3):163-75.

TrackBacks
There are no trackbacks for this entry.

Trackback URL for this entry:
https://www.hypnosisresearchinstitute.org/trackback.cfm?884B81E9-C09F-2A3B-F663ED02C0F2014B

Comments
© 2000 - 2025The International Hypnosis Research Institute, All Rights Reserved.

Contact