Immediate and persisting effects of misleading questions and hypnosis on memory reports
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Mar;8(1):26-32. Scoboria A, Mazzoni G, Kirsch I, Milling LS. Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, USA.
Welcome to The International Hypnosis Research Institute Web site. Our intention is to provide quality information to clinicians and the general public concerning hypnosis, hypnotherapy, and other mind/body modalities. We intend to expand our coverage to include such topics as Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP), energy psychology and medicine, and other related topics. While our intention is to provide quality information derived from valid sources, including peer reviewed literature concerning significant research, this site is not presented as a source of medical or psychological advice. Clinicians wishing to expand their scope of practice or protocols based upon presented information should perform due diligence prior to use. It is our sincere hope to stimulate interest in these topics and to contribute to the evolution of the science of hypnosis. -- Tim Brunson, PhD
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002 Mar;8(1):26-32. Scoboria A, Mazzoni G, Kirsch I, Milling LS. Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, USA.
Study in Nature Neuroscience uncovers possible basis of short-term memory
CLEVELAND - Ben W. Strowbridge, PhD, associate professor of neuroscience and physiology/biophysics, and Phillip Larimer, PhD, a MD/PhD student in the neurosciences graduate program at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, are the first to create stimulus-specific sustained activity patterns in brain circuits maintained in vitro.
Their study, entitled, "Representing information in cell assemblies: Persistent activity mediated by semilunar granule cells" will be published in the February 2010 issue of Nature Neuroscience and is currently available online.
Neuroscientists often classify human memory into three types: declarative memory, such as storing facts or remembering specific events; procedural memory, such as learning how to play the piano or shoot basketballs; and working memory, a type of short-term storage like remembering a phone number. With this particular study, Strowbridge and Larimer, were interested in identifying the specific circuits that could be responsible for working memory.
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):401-13. Epub 2009 Mar 31. McCabe DP, Geraci LD. Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Campus Box 1876, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA.
The relationship between subjective memory beliefs and suggestibility, compliance, false memories, and objective memory performance was studied in a community sample of young and middle-aged people (N = 142). We hypothesized that people with subjective memory problems would exhibit higher suggestibility and compliance levels and would be more susceptible to false recollections than those who are optimistic about their memory. In addition, we expected a discrepancy between subjective memory judgments and objective memory performance. We found that subjective memory judgments correlated significantly with compliance, with more negative memory judgments accompanying higher levels of compliance. Contrary to our expectation, subjective memory problems did not correlate with suggestibility or false recollections. Furthermore, participants were accurate in estimating their objective memory performance.
Am J Psychol. 2009 Summer;122(2):249-57. Van Bergen S, Jelicic M, Merckelbach H. Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.venbergen@psychology.unimaas.nl
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Jul;57(3):269-78. Pyun YD, Kim YJ. Pyun Neuropsychiatric Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. pyunyd@naver.com
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-64. Matzen LE, Benjamin AS. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA. lematze@sandia.gov
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Dec;49(6):507-13. Hjelmsäter ER, Granhag PA, Strömwall LA, Memon A. Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 500, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden. emma.roos@psy.gu.se
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):228-33. Sharman SJ, Barnier AJ. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. s.sharman@unsw.edu.au
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Oct;56(4):425-50. O'Connor AR, Barnier AJ, Cox RE. University of Leeds, United Kingdom. aoconnor@wustl.edu
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1442-56. Kulkofsky S, Klemfuss JZ. Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA. sarah.kulkofsky@ttu.edu
by Tim Brunson DCH
Occasionally I'll encounter 40-ish or older male patients who are encountering learning, memory, and motivation problems. During their intake and subsequent discussions I often detect similar patterns. They are individuals who are successful in their professional lives. Yet, they tend to be over controlling workaholics who equate effort with results. I've even heard more than one of them using the phrase "no pain, no gain." Indeed, too often they equate personal sacrifice with results. This leads to an unbalanced life which will eventually affect their effectiveness. In short, trying too hard will lead to ineffectiveness, a loss of control of their temper, and health problems. To merely treat the presenting memory and motivation problem blindly with hypnosis or allopathic remedies would be unfruitful and potentially harmfully.
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):262-73. French L, Garry M, Mori K. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Memory. 2008 May;16(4):443-61. Halcomb SH, Taylor JP, DeSouza KD, Wallace WP. Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. sara.haber@rice.edu
Memory. 2008;16(5):485-99. Salmon K, Champion F, Pipe ME, Mewton L, McDonald S. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Karen.Salmon@vuw.ac.nz
Memory. 2008;16(5):500-16. Laney C, Loftus EF. University of Leicester, UK. cl136@le.ac.uk
Memory. 2008;16(5):548-55. Wallsten T, Kjellin L, Sjoberg RL. University of Uppsala, Vasterås, Sweden. tuula.wallsten@ltv.se
Memory. 2008;16(6):658-66. Porter S, Taylor K, Ten Brinke L. Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. sbporter@dal.ca
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):180-5. Fazio LK, Marsh EJ. Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0086, USA. lkf@duke.edu
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):190-7. Laney C, Fowler NB, Nelson KJ, Bernstein DM, Loftus EF. University of California-Irvine, CA, USA. CL136@le.ac.uk
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Aug-Sep;31(4):337-46. Price HL, Connolly DA. Department of Psychology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK, Canada S4S 0A2. Heather.Price@uregina.ca
Child Abuse Negl. 2008 Jul;32(7):738-48. Epub 2008 Jul 2. Lyon TD, Dorado JS. University of Southern California Gould School of Law, 699 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071, USA.
Cogn Process. 2005 Dec;6(4):272-81. Epub 2005 Aug 26. Barnier AJ, Bryant RA, Campbell L, Cox R, Harris C, Hung L, Maccallum F, Sharman SJ. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, A.Barnier@unsw.edu.au.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2008 Apr;50(4):343-50. Rossi E, Erickson-Klein R, Rossi K. Ernest@ErnestRossi.com
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Winter;20(1):213-32. Valentino K, Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Toth SL. University of Rochester, USA. kristin.valentino@yale.edu
Willner P. Learning Disability Services, Bro Morgannwg NHS Trust, Neath, UK. p.willner@swansea.ac.uk J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Apr;52(Pt 4):318-26.
Rossi E, Erickson-Klein R, Rossi K. Ernest@ErnestRossi.com Am J Clin Hypn. 2008 Apr;50(4):343-50.
Dev Psychobiol. 2008 Apr;50(3) Groen MA, Yasin I, Laws G, Barry JG, Bishop DV. University of Hamburg, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, Von-Melle-Park 11, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. margriet.groen@uni-hamburg.de
Colloca L, Sigaudo M, Benedetti F. Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, and National Institute of Neuroscience, Corso Raffaello 30, 10125 Turin, Italy. luana.colloca@unito.it Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):211-8.
Principe GF, Guiliano S, Root C. Department of Psychology, Ursinus College, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA. gprincipe@ursinus.edu J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Feb;99(2):135-55.
Bull L. School of Life Sciences, Roehampton University, London, UK. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 May 27:1-12.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jul;46(8) Kuo TY, Van Petten C. Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States; School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ, United States.
by Melany Friedlander, JD, CHt
A Survivor's Story
When Joe came into my office last February, he was very distraught. He had already failed the Bar once and his confidence was at an all time low. Each time he took a practice test, he would just freeze up. Joe had all of the classic symptoms of test anxiety. Since there were only two weeks left before the exam, I suggested we try a quick technique called anchoring. I assured Joe that with this simple tool, he could learn to instantly change his anxiety state into a more resourceful state in a matter of seconds. Joe picked an anchor (finger squeeze) that instantly transported him to a time in his past when he felt calm, collected and confident. Every time he fired off the anchor, he was able to quickly access those positive states. Armed with the right tools, Joe managed to tame his anxiety and pass the Bar! Just imagine having access to your most resourceful states - confidence, relaxation, focus, etc. - in a matter of moments. The tools are literally at your fingertips.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2008 Apr;50(4):343-50. Rossi E, Erickson-Klein R, Rossi K. Ernest@ErnestRossi.com
by Tim Brunson DCH
Intelligence is primarily a measure in one's ability to learn. The underlying theory of intelligence presumes that there are individual differences in the capability to use perception, memory, and learning. This article addresses the relevance of intelligence testing, its proper use in society (to include academic endeavors), and the roles of Gardner's multi-intelligence theory in our societal functioning. Together I see these issues as having scientific, philosophical and even religious/spiritual dimensions. Other than the utility and morality issues, the concept of static versus dynamic/changing intelligence must be discussed.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Sep;98(1):1-19. Principe GF, Tinguely A, Dobkowski N. Department of Psychology, Ursinus College, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA. gprincipe@ursinus.edu
ScientificWorldJournal. 2007 Sep 17;7:1579-89. Ventegodt S, Kandel I, Merrick J. Quality of Life Research Center, Teglgårdstraede 4-8, DK-1452 Copenhagen K, Denmark. ventegodt@livskvalitet.org
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2007 Oct;55(4):426-34. Bryant RA, Fearns S. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. r.bryant@unsw.edu.au
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2008 Apr;56(2):198-213. Eisen ML, Oustinovskaya M, Kistorian R, Morgan DY, Mickes L. California State University, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):321-34. Roediger HL 3rd, Geraci L. Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. roediger@wustl.edu
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1245-54. Devilly GJ, Varker T, Hansen K, Gist R. Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122, Australia. gdevilly@swin.edu.au